What if I told you
that there is a conspiracy of enormous proportions taking place at this
very moment? One that will ultimately cause the destruction of kings,
nations, peoples and principalities. In other words, the end of this
world system. A conspiracy that is so subtle, it's almost undetectable.
One that is so massive in scope, that it includes tens of millions of
people and most governments world wide...Would you believe
Your very life
depends on whether or not you believe and act upon what I am about to
This is not a hoax, or a fairy tale.
What you will learn
here is... TRUTH. And the truth is not something that can be bent,
shifted, looked at from a different angle or viewed in a different
light. The truth is as infallible and unchangeable as certain laws of
Before we begin, I
would like you to keep an open mind and at least examine the
possibility. Take a look at the points that are being made, and even do
your own research.
Most adults are
aware that something is going on, but few know exactly what. Turn on the
evening news and have a seat. It won't be long before the news caster
gives you the gory details of a horrifying event carried out by some
deranged individual. An event such as that which took place in the Tampa
Bay area of Florida mid July, 2000: a frustrated young man in his early
twenties, for reasons apparently unknown, decides to beat his infant son
to death. Or how about this one: teenage girl throws her newborn baby
out the window of a moving vehicle. Or yet another: teenage boy takes
his archery set and kills his mother while she slept with an arrow
through her head. These are just a few out of many violent (and for
those who don't know) senseless acts that have become a normal or at
least, acceptable part of our society; Acceptable in the sense of being
So how is all of the
violence in the world tied to a conspiracy of deception? In order to get
a better understanding of the conspiracy, we must first take a closer
look at the decline in moral values and how they parallel current acts
A moral discourse,
statement, or lesson
A doctrine or
system of moral conduct
principles or rules of conduct
ideals of right human conduct
In the early
1900's, morality took on a very different meaning than it does today.
Giving someone "your word” was a thing of honor and a badge of trust.
Business deals were sealed with a hand shake. People could walk down the
street in relative safety and more often than not, would have been
greeted in a pleasant or at least cordial manner. If a woman wore a
dress with the hem line just a few inches above her ankles, she would
have been consider a floozy and shunned by those in respectable circles.
Sure, there were violent crimes, robberies and even child abuse, but
they were nowhere near the proportions that we see them today.
In our present day society, trust is all but a thing of the past. "Your
word", is just a bunch of hot air. What has taken its place is your
social security number; DOB (Date of Birth); address for the past five
years; references and credit reports; and soon, implantable micro chips.
If a woman wore an old fashioned dress with the hem line just a few
inches above her ankles today, she would be considered weird, a prude.
WHAT'S MORALLY ACCEPTABLE IN OUR
The murdering of
unborn children (Abortion)
The murdering of
partially born children (Partial Birth Abortion); one of the most
horrific and inhumane methods of killing an unwanted child. (It's
absolutely amazing that we, as a society, can allow such procedures to
be preformed yet still refer to ourselves as good human beings...
The above list
contains just a few key points which I would like to take a little time
to examine more closely.
Let's take a look
at abortion: not too many years ago, abortion was view as a last choice
option. The shame that an unmarried expectant mother would most
likely face once it has been discovered that she was pregnant; may have
been the young women's' main consideration when deciding whether or not
to get an abortion. Having to face her her parents searing remarks,
disgust and the disappointment they had in her would certainly add fuel
to the fire in favor of carrying out the secret procedure. And
sometimes, the father of the unborn child, and or his parents would
become the driving forces in determining what steps should be taken. In
most cases when the decision was made to get an abortion, it was because
either the child was conceived through rape; The girl was unmarried
and/or too young and the parents may have insisted in order to keep the
Have you heard of
Partial Birth Abortion? Do you know how it is performed?
Well your about to
ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby's leg with forceps.
The baby's leg is
pulled out into the birth canal.
delivers the baby's entire body except for the head.
jams scissors into the baby's skull. The scissors are then opened to
enlarge the hole.
The scissors are
removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child's brains are
sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then
Look at how far into
the sewer we've gone. Abortion is no longer a perceived matter of
necessity, but instead it has become as trivial as a matter of
convenience. Sleep around when ever you want, and if you make a
mistake... who cares... just get rid of it like some piece of worthless
garbage and the problem goes away.
Abortionists like to
use the terms "embryo" or "fetus", which are deceptive names for "an
unborn human child". And likewise the term "abortion" which is another
name for 'MURDER". By calling the act of murder "abortion" and denying
the fact that there is a living little person in the mothers womb, we
gradually and over time, become desensitized to this wicked practice. No
matter how you look at it... it is without a doubt, the murder of a
would-be future person.
Did you know that
some in the medical field want to keep abortion at an all time high? An
abortionist can perform a significant number of abortions per day,
earning a decent profit on each. In addition, abortion makes an easy,
plentiful supply of human tissue and organs... for free. Abortion is
also a tool used to thin out the population by way of murder with the
blessings of the Government. There doesn't have to be an issue with the
woman's or the child's health. The pregnancy doesn't have to be the
result of a sexual assault or incest. The abortion can be preformed for
practically any reason at all; And in some places, the medical staff
doesn't even need the permission of the parents of pregnant minors.
approximately 6.3 million pregnancies every year in the United States.
Of those 6 million plus pregnancies, 48% of them were unintended. That's
3,024,000 accidental babies that their parents never intended to have.
But, the worst part of these statistics are that 47% of the pregnancies
end in abortion. That translates into 1,421,280 unborn babies
being killed every year. Just imagine, if your mother had decided to
abort you... you wouldn't be reading this message.
Our moral values
have declined so much so, that we now go about our daily lives in a
depraved state of existence calling evil good and good evil. The change
is slow and gradual but steady. With each passing day, society sinks
deeper and deeper into the abyss. Allowing more and more perversions to
take place without so much as a surprised glance.
that I make here are not intended to anger anyone, but the TRUTH must be
Would you drink
gasoline... or fill your cars gas tank with water? Does a lion eat
vegetables... or does a rabbit eat meat? What about a man giving
birth... or a woman being able to father a child?
Of course not...
everything in life has its proper order. Men and women were designed to
fit together, both physically and emotionally, even as far as the
raising of children. Ideally, it takes a man and a women to raise a
child. Men instill certain values and characteristics to the children
that only men have. Likewise women instill certain values and
characteristics that only women have.
I'm sure that many
of you believe in the theory of evolution. Why then are there not any
species that have evolved to homosexuality except mankind? There are
some species that are able to change their sex. If there is a shortage
of males for example, then a female of the species can become a male in
order to reproduce. Or likewise, if there is a shortage of females, then
the male can become a female. But, the reason is to continue the line...
to keep from becoming extinct. Sex, has one purpose and one purpose
only. And that's for the continuation of the species. Of course it was
meant to be a pleasurable experience. If sex was distasteful or an
undesirable act, then most of us probably wouldn’t be here.
another example of deteriorating moral values which is also a forerunner
for even more perverse acts. If the homosexual (alternative) life style
is accepted as normal, then it will open the door for other groups who
have "different taste". If homosexuality is normalized, then why not
bestiality or child molestation? It's not as far fetched as it
sounds. Not too long ago, I heard a televised report about a group
of individuals who wanted the act of having sex with children to
It may take a long
time to demoralize society to the point of total acceptance, but
eventually (if the world were to last long enough) most forms of sexual
preference would be acceptable as simply an alternate life style. Just
look at what's acceptable now in the so called age of enlightenment by
comparison to twenty, fifty or one hundred years ago.
A moral nation
does well and prospers but, a vile and depraved nation is like a
piece of rotting flesh. It festers and decays. Slowly at first, but as
the degenerative process continues and with ever increasing rapidity...
eventually it is nothing but dust...
fornication and adultery, prostitution, drugs and alcohol, are all a
cancerous blight on American society. They help to promote violence and
crime as well as to determine what sort of world we live in both now and
in the future.
desire to an abnormal and even dangerous level.
perceptions of women and men.
in marriage by producing feelings of inadequacy and dissatisfaction
with one’s mate.
children through divorce and sometimes, sexual abuse.
slavery and child prostitution, where young girls and boys are forced
to perform sexual acts by violence, the threat of violence, forced
drug addiction or in exchange for food and shelter.
(The majority of
child prostitutes in America are run a ways that quickly fall victim to
fornication Adultery and Prostitution:
fatherless children who are then instilled with the values or
valueless ness of their adulterous or prostitute mothers.
children of an adulterous relationship the hazards of being raised by
the husband of the adulteress.
children under subjection to all the Johns and pimps that pass through
a prostitute’s doorway.
illegal drug sales. (A vast number of street level prostitutes are
also heavy drug users).
growth of neighborhoods and entire cities. (Turns areas into ghettos).
robbery, rape and child abuse.
hopelessness and despair. Which in turn causes another generation to
fall victim to this insidious plot.
violence and break up of the family.
fatalities due to intoxicated drivers.
Some believe that
the plight of the inner city does not and will not affect them. There
fore, they concern themselves only a little. But remember, this great
nation of ours is as a house with many rooms. There are different
families living there, each having their own culture and their own ways.
Even though these families are all different from each other, there is a
commonality... We all live in the same house! If a fire starts in one
part of the house, does it not threaten your own security? And if it's
allowed to continue, will it not burn down the whole house?
The more we accept,
the more will be thrust upon us
In the early days of
television, during such programs as The Dick Van Dike Show and I Love
Lucy, what was allowed to be shown and or perceived was very different
from what we accept as normal by today's standards.
The very idea of a
man and his wife sleeping in the same bed together was taboo. Each bed
room scene had two beds, one for him and one for her. Every one knew
that they, as a married couple, had sex, but it wasn't the focus of the
show. Even a lot of the films that were produced for the theater, would
not show sex scenes other than a couple kissing and or embracing. One
way that you could tell what happened next was... the camera would pan
away and show a scene such as the curtains gently blowing in the breeze,
or one or both parties smoking a cigarette afterwards.
As time went on, the
writers, directors and producers of the movie industry gradually added
scenes and language which were to push the limits.
The other day, I saw
a television commercial that just twenty years ago would have caused a
public out cry and most likely, would have been taken off the air. It
was around 7:00 in the evening mid July 2000. I don't remember what was
being advertised. What I do remember is: there were two young men
jogging down a path in a partially isolated area, when one of them
strayed off the path and into a grassy field in order to relieve
himself. Suddenly, he was bitten by a snake, somewhere on his upper leg
or thigh. His running mate ran over to give medical assistance. He drops
to his knees, places his mouth over the wound and begins to suck out the
venom. Just about that time, a young woman came jogging down the same
path. As the camera pulled back to capture the entire scene, it appeared
as if the man who had been bitten by the snake, was receiving oral sex
from his (male) partner.
What affect do you
think that commercial will have on young people? Is there a hidden
agenda? Someone trying to kill two birds with one stone? Perhaps the
writers of this commercial were not only trying to sell a product, but
also to promote homosexuality as an alternative life style or as a
normal situation. One thing is certain, if confronted, they would never
admit to having an ulterior motive.
programming is not the only culprit. Have you listened to the lyrics of
a lot of the popular music lately? There are tunes that sing and or talk
about doing all sorts of evil deeds. Everything from killing police
officers, to treating women like dogs, to taking what you want by force.
I have heard songs that tell the listener to: kill your mom, kill your
teacher, sacrifice to the devil, hate, steal, hurt... and the list goes
on and on. Is there any need to wonder why our young people are so
angry? Why there's so much disrespect?
If you think that
what you see and hear doesn't affect you then how about this: Ever go to
a martial arts movie? After the movie was over, did you feel like an
expert, or a tough guy? Did you ever watch a movie where the main
character (one of the good guys) received one injustice after another?
Did it make you angry or upset? What about that sad movie, did it make
Adolph Hitler used
the power of speech in order to captivate his audience. With a
philosophy based on distorted perceptions, racism, nationalism and the
prospect of greatness and power through world domination, he was able to
persuade his followers. Being like zombies, they carried out Hitler's
diabolical scheme... ever pressing forward with little or no reasoning.
What if the
German people or even the peoples of the world had decided to oppose the
dictatorship of Adolph Hitler before he had a chance to consolidate his
power? Would he still have been responsible for the murder of over six
million innocent Jewish people? Would all of those valiant allied
soldiers have died?
The German soldiers
who also died did so because they accepted the doctrines of a mad man. I
won't go into it here, but if you were to research Adolph and what he
believed in along with the things that he did, I'm sure that you would
discover that he had in fact been deceived into believing the
The point is this;
what we see and hear definitely affects our emotional state of mind and
can even affect our thought processes and behavioral patterns. In
essence, it can change who we are.
As I said in the
first paragraph, tens of millions are involved, along with most
governments world wide, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
don't even know why they are doing what they do. They seem to be
oblivious to their part in the conspiracy. Each one focuses on his or
her own agenda and even though they may be separated by time and
distance, it still fits into the master plan.
There will be more on the master plan
who are they? Are they individuals who through a sense of unfaltering
loyalty to country, flag and citizens, selflessly dedicate their lives
to their nation, and the principles on which it was founded? Or are they
ordinary people just seeking power, fame and fortune?
In part, politicians
are responsible. They seek to change the laws in order to appease or
manipulate the population... a population which has already been tricked
into lowering its moral values and accepting any "feel good" philosophy.
It has been said that, "if you stand for nothing... you'll fall for
anything". I'm sorry to say that, most politicians fit the bill
perfectly. They enter a political race with a long list of what they
stand for... but will change their views in midstream. Not because they
saw the light, but because they realized that their constituents have a
different view. It's not just those running for office who will bow to
public opinion, but also those (already in office) who know that
reelection time is just around the corner.
Have you ever
noticed your local governments highly publicized crack down on crime, or
an attempt to get an important construction project off the ground right
around election time? It couldn't possibly be because they're seeking
reelection or (if they're leaving office) want to be remembered for
their accomplishments could it? I like the style of our American
forefathers... they may not have always been right, but they stood for
what they believed in, sometimes until death.
which includes, TV & radio news, programming, advertising agencies and
news papers have a primary focus of making money. But at the same
time, most of them (especially the news and TV programming media) also
have a hidden agenda to impose their views on an unsuspecting audience.
It's a very subtle way to manipulate public opinion.
Do we even think
for ourselves anymore? Or do we base our opinions on what the media
portrays as the truth?
During both W.W.I
and W.W.II, one of the most noticeable ways that the media and
governments manipulated public opinion, was to demonize the enemy.
Portraying them in cartoon form as grotesquely hideous beast... a nation
and a peoples who were incapable of expressing normal human emotions.
Today, the methods
used are much more subtle and effective. But in many ways the same as
what was used in the past. One example that comes to mind is the plight
of black people in America. Subjected to the hate spawned fire of
racism... a fire that not only burns the victim, but also consumes the
perpetrator, and eventually, the nation.
Blacks in America
are portrayed by the media as... well, almost the same way that the
enemies in W.W.I and W.W.II were. Watch the news, whenever they're doing
a negative story, (not on a particular event but in general) such as a
story about drugs, crime or welfare, you will see African American
people plastered all over the screen. On the other hand, if the
story is about something positive such as the good deeds of the medical
profession, most of the faces shown are white. In the movies, blacks are
presented as chauffeurs, garbage men, pimps & prostitutes, drug crazed
addicts, gangsters and generally illiterate people with few if any good
qualities. They are almost always subordinate to the "Caucasian" star of
the film and if in a position of authority such as the captain of
a police force, then they're portrayed as if they really don't know what
they're doing and should not even be in that position. When the reality
is, there is a multitude of intelligent black people in this country and
in the world. Doctors, lawyers, engineers, business owners and much
more, as a matter of fact, the number one brain surgeon in all the world
is a black man.
Subliminal? Is it
reminiscent of the demonization tactics used during major conflicts
between nations? If I were to ask you, "which group makes up the largest
percentage of welfare recipients in the US" you would probable name one
of the ethnic groups of color. But the statistics say that it's the
"single white female" who's the number one welfare recipient in the US.
But if left to the media, you would never be the wiser.
reasons could the media have for creating such negative images in the
minds of the general public? Answer... it's a major effort to control
your mind, the outcome of events and to maintain a substantial influence
over a nation and its people through deception. In other words, power.
Why do you
think that nations such as Red China, only allow state run media
If a trusted friend
of yours speaks badly about someone, it can cause you to develop a
prejudice towards that person even though you've never met. Like wise,
if the media, whom we've all come to trust (at least to some extent),
gives us a biased view of ethnic groups, politics, religion etc., we can
and sometimes do end up with the same views... especially if it appears
that the majority of the population also has that view.
We trust the
news media enough to believe most of what they tell us...
Case in point: in
1938, a book written by author H.G. Wells titled War of the Worlds, was
broadcast live from the Mercury Theater. In short, the book was about
the world being invaded by a superior alien life form from mars.
Without warning, the
broadcaster interrupts the regularly scheduled program, and as a news
caster would report a major catastrophe... began enacting the play
complete with sound effects. Before it was all over, a significant
portion of the American population were experiencing a case of mass
is another culprit in the conspiracy. Without any concern for their
employees, they move jobs from this country to over seas all in the name
of profits. (This is just one example)
endeavors to expand in order to assure its survival. Expansion requires
large amounts of capital which can come from several sources. The
company can fund its own expansion provided that its profits are
sufficient. It can seek loans from financial institutions but, the
company must either be solvent or show that they will be solvent after
the loan. They can also seek out private investors or go public i.e. the
When a company sends
business over seas, the results for Americans can be devastating.
Workers are forced out of jobs. Families break up, which in turn add
more burdens on society by increasing the need for government services
to the newly under privileged. The federal, state and local tax base
shrinks, which is where the funding for social services comes from.
Domestic violence and divorce rates go up. Children have to adjust to
being raised by one parent or have to split there time between the both
of them. Parents and children alike turn to drugs and alcohol as a means
to alleviate the pressure or sometimes, just to rebel against the
Why do companies
send their business over seas? Is it because the cost of doing business
in this country is too much to bear? In most cases the answer is no.
Take a look at the following hypothetical example:
Why does the Big
Bucks Company (fictitious), decide to ship its production line to Korea?
Let's say that the company makes brooms for sweeping floors. The
American worker gets paid $10.00 per hour plus another $8.00 in
benefits. That's a total of $18.00 per hour. The worker produces 10
brooms each hour which sell to the retailer for $5.00 each. That's a
total of $50.00 in gross receipts minus the $18.00 for employee cost and
it leaves a meager $32.00. When you add in such cost as raw materials,
office supplies, transportation, utilities, warehousing expenses etc.,
Mr. Big Bucks would be lucky to have a bottom line profit of a dollar or
two. But when multiplied by the volume of sales annually, in can be in
At today's rate of
exchange, Mr. big bucks himself would make an outrageous profit if he
moves to Korea. Currently, $1.00 American is worth 1,298.7 Korean won
(July 2001). So if the Korean worker was paid 18.00 won per hour, it
would total around 1 1/2 cents US. Even after adding the above mentioned
cost plus shipping and import duties, the bottom line profit would be
Mr. Big Bucks
knows that he and his crew (executive staff) are making a good profit
here in America but it's not about money, he already has enough for his
family and generations to come. But instead, it's about power. It's
about the power to change the course of national and even world events.
It's about the God-like feeling one gets when offered free tickets the
super bowl because of one's status. Or to be begged to attend a function
of the aristocrats. Or the ability to pick up the phone and speak with
the President of the United States.
Can you set up
an appointment to speak with the President of the United States? What
about Bill Gates, can he?
obtained by the few is generally acquired through the blood, sweet and
tears of the many.
"I love power. But
it is as an artist that I love it. I love it as a musician loves his
violin, to draw out its sounds and chords and harmonies."
The Master Plan
I hope that by this
time, you are beginning to glimpse the scope of this conspiracy and the
affect that it's having on society as a whole. But, there is so much
more, that I would have to write a book in order to totally expose the
LIE, but because of the fact that time is so short, I must give you the
We are being
manipulated through a series of lies and misinformation. Manipulated in
order to produce a peoples that will behave more like cattle...
passively minding their own business, while being herded to where ever
the owner desires and ultimately, being lead to the slaughter house. By
the time they are aware of their fate, it's too late.
Have you ever given
thought to what the existence of a horse wearing blinders must be like?
The blinders are placed on the horses head to keep the horse from being
distracted, only able to see what's directly in front of it. There fore,
the horse goes through life without ever seeing the whole picture.
If we as people are
forced to wear the blinders of deceit, then we too will not see the
whole picture. And as a result, we as individuals will be lead to the
Day is day and night
is night, and the day cannot be called night, neither can the night be
called day. Truth is truth; it cannot be subject to perceptions. It
either is, or it is not.
Would anyone care
for some evolution?
Did you know that
some people call evolution "evil-lution"? The theory of evolution
is taught in schools as fact. It goes something like this: hundreds of
millions of years ago, some cosmic hicky-ma-doodles fell to earth and
became life. Over the course of millions of years, this life crawled out
of the water and onto dry land. This creature, after long periods of
transitions then became a monkey and finally, became man (and all the
other creatures that we know of). Of course, there were many different
forms of life in between and it all took place over the course of
hundreds of millions of years.
The theory of
evolution came about as a result of a man named Charles Darwin (there
were others before Darwin, but he has become a key figure). Darwin
traveled to a remote island and observed all the animals that were
there. He noticed that there were many similarities between the
different species of animals and tentatively concluded that they must
have come from a single species. From there the whole thing escalated to
where it is today.
Even though he
admitted in his book (Origin of Species) that, "My work is now nearly
finished; but as it will take me two or three more years to complete
it, and as my health is far from strong, I have been urged to publish
this Abstract." and " No doubt errors will have crept in, though
I hope I have always been cautious in trusting to good authorities
One of Darwin's
beliefs as a naturalist was, that humans, animals and insects are all
accidents. He also believed that such vital parts of the human body
(teeth, limbs, fingers etc.), which all serve a precise purpose and
specific function, were just accidental... sort of a trail & error
experiment of nature that lasted many generations (per species) and then
finally, was gotten right.
Do you think it's
possible that something as simple as your Timex wrist watch, could have
over the course hundreds of millions of years, have come into existence
by itself... without thought or purpose? Perhaps it started out as a
Take a look at the
complexity of the human body. To say that the body, which is tens of
thousands of times more complex than a 747, just by random chance
happened to appear, is like saying that a tornado blew through a junk
yard and formed a fully functional airplane. It's absurd. But yet, it's
continually presented as fact.
The more that
scientist explore the universe and life itself, the more they begin to
realize that... life is by design.
Let's take a quick
look at the insect world. There are many different species of insects.
Some are predators, some are vegetarians and some eat what other animals
and insects excrete as waste from their bodies and still others consume
the rotting flesh of dead things. All of them have their own methods of
self defense. One insect in particular, called the mantis, should give
one reason to rethink their position on evolution. The praying mantis is
a creature which is able to blend among the leaves of the trees and
other vegetation almost undetectable.
According to the
evolutionist, this creature would have evolved to Its present day form
for at least several different reasons. One of which is that the mantis
is much more likely to capture it's prey while at the same time avoid
becoming some other creatures prey. Because of its inconspicuousness, it
is able to help insure the survival of its species. The very concept
speaks of a designer.
The simple fact that the mantis blends in with its environment should
tell you that there's some form of intelligence at work. If it were not
by design, then there would be no rhyme or reason, and the mantis could
quite conceivable turn out in a hot pink color which would be most
inviting to its predators. If it were a purely random, non conscious
act, then why doesn't a green mantis live in an environment like the
desert... where it would stick out like a sore thumb? It would have
probably long since been extinct.
Ask yourself these questions:
What forces could have possibly determined that outcome?
If long hook-like limbs were needed to catch prey, how was
that decision reached and by whom?
If it were all accidental, then how did it turn out that all
parts of this insect function with such precision as if by design?
the mantis were an intelligent creature, it wouldn't be as hard to
understand how over the course of millions of years, it had decided
to give itself a better design through plastic surgery or genetic
manipulation. If there were an overseer, some supreme being who looked
at the situation and decided that there needed to be some changes made
in the life of this particular insect, again it would easily
understandable. But according to our scientist, insects have no
intelligence at all, they only have a built in instinct for survival.
They also tell us that there is no supreme being, there's only something
that's called Mother Nature, which appears to be a chaotic chain of
natural events with an uncanny ability to produce a completely
functional environment as well as life itself.
The environment that Mother Nature (supposedly) created is finely tuned
and tightly intertwined. A menagerie of elements interdependent upon
each other in order to produce an outcome that is capable of creating
and supporting life. An ecosystem that is so sensitive that any outside
interference (mankind) could upset the delicate balance.
For example: in the 1950's & 60's the aerosol filled spray can
was a very popular item. The manufacturer would fill the cans containing
deodorants, hairspray, insecticides etc., with an aerosol gas
propellant. What was unknown at the time was, that the
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) used in the aerosols were destroying the
ozone layer. Ozone is a thin layer in the stratosphere that filters out
excessive amounts of UV radiation as well as other forms of high energy
radiation. With out the ozone layer, we would all be cooked, as in
microwave. Isn't it amazing that there just happen to be an ozone layer
surrounding the earth?
How does one get order from the disorder of Mother Nature? How do you
get a set pattern of events, which happen the same way time after time,
from randomization? You don't... the theory of natural selection, has
about as much of a chance at producing life, as someone who rolls a pair
of dice and consistently gets a 7.
Another point that strengthened Darwin's belief in the evolution theory
was this: he examined the same species of animal, insect and plant life
which were found in different geographical/environmental locations. He
discovered that even though the species were of the same family, there
were differences based on its geographical/environmental locations. In
other words, these species had adapted to their environment. And at
least in part, he concluded that the species had to have evolved.
there are many species of animal and insects which live in arid climates
and are specifically adapted to their environment. The Australian water
frog is one such creature. It lives in a cocoon filled with water under
a dry lake or river bed. When the rains come again, the moisture
penetrates the sun baked soil and reaches the hibernating frog. It
awakens, burrows its way out of the ground and carries on with the
activities of life until the waters begin to disappear again, at which
time, the frog burrows its way back into the mud and goes into
hibernation again. This frog can live in its cocoon for up to seven
years without rain.
Everyone is familiar with the automobile. It has tires filled with air
to allow the vehicle to roll across a surface with reduced friction. It
has an engine to provide power by compressing a gas/air mixture in the
cylinder chamber. An electrical spark which is produced by the ignition
coil, is applied to the mixture. The resulting explosions force the
pistons to move. This energy is then transferred to the wheels by way of
a transmission and drive shaft or transaxle drive axles. There is a
steering wheel to control the direction of movement, an accelerator and
break pedal to control its speed and it even has doors for accessibility
and seats for the safety and comfort of the occupants.
Now I ask you... Was it random, or by design?
you had no way of knowing, (let's say that you came from a planet
millions of light years away and had never seen people or automobiles
before and if the inhabitants of the earth were long gone by the time
that you got here) and if you have the same mind set as evolutionist,
you might say that it was random.
think that the automobile is a random event would be just as idiotic as
thinking that life itself, which is composed of billions of strands of
DNA, (the blue prints of life), is a random and meaningless event. Even
though, each strand acts as a biological instruction manual for every
living creature and is responsible for determining everything about
every species and including which species it will turn out to be.
The mantis’s design serves a specific purpose. Just as all the parts of
an automobile have a specific purpose… every cell in the human body
functions according to its design.
One of the elements needed to sustain human and animal life is oxygen.
And one of the elements needed to sustain plant life is, carbon dioxide.
So in light of this fact, isn't it ironic that humans & animals inhale
oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide while plants absorb carbon dioxide and
produce oxygen? This exchange between plants, humans and animals most
certainly has the appearance of having been designed.
animals, insects and mankind are the result of evolution, then why is
man the only species that comes in so few colors and only one basic
style? Why do none of the colors that we come in relate to environmental
camouflage? And finally; why is man the only species (out of
millions of insects and animals) capable of intelligent speech and
communication? After all, if life is the result of natural selection
derived from some form of randomized chaos, then other species would
have been brought into existence by those same forces. The probability
of certain insects and or animals having the ability to hold intelligent
conversations with each other, as well as being able to communicate with
other species (possibly including mankind), would be just as likely as
our own ability to transcend language and cultural barriers.
Because The Theory of Evolution
plays such a major part in the overall conspiracy, I will devote more
attention to this misleading doctrine.
"The finches of the Galapagos islands are now called Darwin’s finches,
because they appear to support evolution. Scientist did find larger
beaks in response to a drought but, when the stress of the drought
ended, so did the big beaks."
would like to present you with a quote from Dr. Jonathan Wells during an
interview by Pat Robertson of the 700 Club. Dr. Wells is the author of a
book titled Icons of Evolution (it would be worth while to read it). His
credits are as follows:
Ph.D. in cell and developmental biology from The University
of California at
2nd Ph.D. from
Serves as a Senior Fellow at The Discovery Institute in
While studying Biology at Berkeley "I was surprised to find that a
famous set of embryo drawings which supposedly showed that humans share
a common ancestor with fish, were actually faked in the 19th century".
He went on to say "Since I was studying embryology, the truth was
obvious to me and I began following up on other famous text book images
and I found that they likewise, misrepresented the truth and in some
cases, are actually fake".
Why were these images faked? The real reason for such frauds in my
opinion is this: since the evolutionist consistently fails to produce
any incontrovertible proof, they are force to invent their own. This
saves the scientific community from a major embarrassment, loss of
credibility and from having to discard their beliefs. Which would once
again leave the question “where did we come from” unanswered?
took over 40 years to realize that Piltdown man, represented by
hominid like fossil specimens found in Britain, was a fraud.
"Piltdown was discovered in 1953 to have been nothing more than an Ape's
jaw placed with a human skull. It was a hoax preformed on purpose. They
recognized neither the jaw to be an ape’s nor the skull to be a human's.
Instead, they declared each part as an in between of ape and human.
They dated it to be 500,000 years old, gave it a name
(Eoanthropus Dawsoni or Dawn Man'), and wrote some 500 books on
it. The discovery' fooled paleontologists for forty five years.
There are many inconsistencies in the evolutionist theory. The evidence
has not been produced to support their claims and even they themselves
have questions that must be answered in order for the theory to survive.
Some people want so much to believe that, they will even make up their
Another way to help reinforce evolution is to teach it in schools as
Are we being
taught to think for ourselves, or have we been brainwashed?
The majority of young people in the public school systems have little
reason to doubt their teachers. After all, the teachers are highly
educated professionals in a position of authority. Young children are
gullible, easily persuaded and can even be intimidated into accepting
the doctrine of evolution.
When it's time to take a test, the child had better agree with the
principles of evolution or they may end up with lower scores and even be
ridiculed for not believing. In the mind of a child, evolution is
the only choice. There are no opposing views, and the theory is taught
as fact along side of other scientific facts. Some of these young
people go on to become teachers themselves. They attend colleges where
the theory of evolution is further perpetuated. Base on books such as
Darwin's "Origin of Species", which was incomplete and could draw no
definite conclusions, these new teachers go out into the world armed
with small fragments of proposed truths. Many of the authors of these
books and even other highly recognized members of the evolutionary
belief system (religion), have admitted that there are too many
inconsistencies as will be discussed below. Keep in mind that, if
evolution was a fact, they wouldn't need to keep changing their views.
There are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either the
fossil record or the modern world. If in fact, life on earth evolved
according to the principles and guide lines as set forth by the
evolutionist, then there would most certainly be fossilized records. The
evidence would show the transition from one form of life to another for
example: amphibian to reptile or plant to animal or monkey to man. All
of the fossils found to date are fully formed. Where are the fossils
that show animals with partially formed limbs or other biological parts?
The different species all appear suddenly in the fossil record.
Even Darwin had doubts about the validity of his dogma. He writes, "Why,
if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine
gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why
is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see
them, well defined?" I believe that, had Darwin not been persuaded to
publish his findings prematurely, he would have concluded that evolution
was not possible.
Have you ever
gone riding in your car and discover that your lost? After passing the
same landmark several times, your spouse ask "are you lost?” Do you
admit that your lost and run the risk of losing face? Or, do you play it
off as if it were your intention to pass the same convenience store
"Because of the lack of evidence for gradual evolution in the fossil
record, more and more evolutionists are adopting a new theory of
evolution known as macroevolution. The theory of macroevolution teaches
that animals and plants changed suddenly from one kind to another
without going through any gradual or transitional process. All the
information' for the development of each particular organism was already
encoded' in the DNA of its parent. They must reproduce after their
scientific community has to continually change its views on evolution,
then perhaps they should reevaluate the whole idea and quit trying to
fit a "square peg in a round hole".
The second law of thermodynamics states that: when left to themselves,
all things tend to deteriorate rather than develop. So the idea
that life, somehow was able to come from nothing and then to build upon
itself in an evolutionary manor, is in direct contrast with this law. By
the way, the second law of thermodynamics is a universally accepted
Roger Lewin, a well known paleontologist, also had some serious
perplexities about the theory. When referring to the gap between people
and animals, he states, "Our intelligence, our reflective consciousness,
our extreme technological facility, our complex spoken language, our
sense of moral and ethical values -- each of these is apparently
sufficient to set us apart from nature. Together they are seen to give
us dominion over nature'. He adds that for evolutionists this gap is an
"embarrassment, something to be explained away."
Alfred R. Wallace along with famous evolutionist Robert Broom concluded
"Divine intervention was the only explanation for the origin of the
qualities that made Homo sapiens so special."
Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar
chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the
chimpanzee is people's closest relative. Yet regarding this we must
observe the following:
chemistry indicates that the donkey is man's closest relative."
level tests indicate that the garter snake is man's closest
enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man's closest
"On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter
bean is man's closest relative."
Broom asserted, "Much of evolution looks as if it had been planned
to result in man, and in other animals and plants to make the world a
suitable place for him to dwell in (and therefore)... the evolution
of man must have been planned by some spiritual power."
Biochemists Allen Wilson and Vincent Sarich discovered that the first
people had to originate less than 200,000 years ago and could only have
come from an original two people. Which made all of the paleontologist's
dates incorrect. It also made the presumption of human origins
incorrect... "(That modern humans evolved in many different areas at the
same time) is theoretically implausible based on current knowledge (in
population genetics)." Popular geneticist Shahin Rouhani.
Paleontologist Roger Lewin admits, "The mitochondrial DNA technique
appears to support the Noah's Ark hypothesis..." (that we originated
from one set of people at the same location not many people and places
as the evolutionists concluded).
"Socially, natural selection argues that the best and fittest society
would be one where its' individuals look out only for themselves and
would advance themselves, if possible, at the expense of others. Thus
barbarianism is demanded by natural selection with the destruction of
the weak and the free domain of the powerful. It demands total
annihilation of anything weaker than necessary and the ruling of anyone
more powerful than others. People exhibit mercy, pity, and morality,
all of which inhibit natural selection. Practically, natural
selection has the following and many other inconsistencies:
(a.) The natural selection process could not have the forethought to
allow an organism to become worse temporarily in order to ultimately
form an eye, for example.
(b.) Natural selection requires that organisms began as crude, yet an
organism could not have survived without basic intricate functions such
as respiration and reproduction. These had to exist from the beginning
of the organism.
(c.) Our bodies depend on systems that run according to intricate order
such as from DNA. A system dependent on order cannot be created by
Natural Selection commends savages who eliminate the weak. It commended
the ruthless takeover of the Native Indian of North America, the
destruction of Jews in the Holocaust, and all other acts where the
powerful ruthlessly have their way. It names all who kill as better. It
would name a country that destroys all others as best. Natural Selection
argues against such things as vaccinations that help the weak. It
demands that the weaker not reproduce so that society not be dragged
Even animals, however, exhibit altruism. Walruses sacrifice their lives
for their young. Some heard animals provide warning signals for the herd
which put themselves at personal risk. Bees and ants function together
and not merely in competition. And, of course, so do people do all these
things. Yet Darwin stated, "If it could be proved that any species
had been formed for the exclusive good of another species, it would
annihilate my theory for such could not have been produced through
Natural selection demands progress at every step of change. It cannot
have forethought and planning and thus bear up with say a half formed
eye in order to form the eye. How then was the eye produced since
natural selection demands it to have been partly formed at some point?
"It seems that evolutionists, whether consciously or unconsciously, have
regarded the blind and inanimate forces of the environment, or nature,
as having the ability to create and think."
The world is full of interdependence and it makes natural selection
unthinkable. How did lungs form if lungs are necessary for our lives
from the start? How did we reproduce if it took millions of years for
our reproduction systems to evolve? Reproduction was necessary for
survival but how could natural selection create this? One sex had to
exist before natural selection would bring another sex into existence.
How did the first sex get there and how did reproduction take place
while the other sex was forming? Or, are we to believe that they
just both formed independently perfectly suited for one another?"
the event that you haven't yet figured it out, I will put it as simply
as possible. Which is to say that, natural selection/evolution is an
intentional and purposeful LIE.
is not possible to have accidental life. The conditions necessary for
life to exist, are interdependent upon other innumerable circumstances.
All of which must come into play at exactly the right time.
The theory of evolution
is a major part of the overall conspiracy.
reference to what we've discussed earlier (abortion, drugs, crime and
immorality etc.), can in part, be traced back to the philosophy of
evolution. For example: if humans are the result of evolution, then
morality becomes relative to the ethics of a society (cannibalism is
morally acceptable within some groups). In the beginning, there are no
standards with which to set guidelines except those that, we ourselves
define to be acceptable. If abortion is deemed moral and prostitution is
not, then society has determined its own standards in the absences of
any outside influences. If we as a group, are able to decide what's
right or wrong, then we have no one to answer to except those of us who
are appointed judges. Judges who also hold dear to the ideologies of the
society from which they came. So with evolution, morality becomes
liquid, flexible and can be made to reflect the desires of its people.
There by giving an impression of a moral correctness. (Citizens of Rome
use to find it entertaining to watch gladiators kill each other in the
arenas. And if asked, they would not have thought anything wrong with
But on the other hand, if there is a designer of life, a Supreme Being,
then it stands to reason that morality would have also been part of His
plan. This in turn means that morality is not flexible and can not be
transgressed with impunity. The designer would also have the right to
decide what's acceptable and what's not, to set guide lines and laws of
conduct. He would have an expectation of how we are to behave and what
consequences we will face if we don't.
Evolutionists don’t like the idea of having to be in submission to
someone who's bigger, better and infinitely more intelligent then
themselves. But the same can be said of many others as well. Doctors &
lawyers, teachers & politicians and people in general, would all like to
think that "we are special", the best of the best. It's an emotion
called, PRIDE: which is to be proud, to have one's self respect, the
feeling of being special. So in part, it could be said that evolution is
being taught in order to hide the truth, to instill a perception of
ultimate authoritarianism in the minds of the masses by this elite group
and on a personal level; pride. It can also be said that, if evolution
is perceived as truth, then society, by way of the authoritarians, can
continue propagating its moral standards. Having the ability to change
the standards, allows scientific pursuits (for instances), to be geared
towards otherwise immoral acts. For example, embryonic stem cell
research. If it's immoral to use embryos for this purpose but, research
is allow to continue, eventually it will be acceptable to the general
population and with acceptability, comes a new definition of morality.
evolution is a fact, then not only does it justify the exhibition
of animalistic behavior among people, but it also allows for the gradual
persuasion of society (changes in morality), as well as many other
immoral acts and doctrines. Of which, one of the most disturbing and
potentially devastating is in the following statement: "the end
justifies the means". It can be said that this philosophy is responsible
for literally millions of deaths. Just using America as an example, did
the end result (America today, in all of its perceived majesty and
greatness), justify the means (the merciless slaughter of American
Indians: men, women and children)? Or, (the enslavement, torture and
rape of African American men, women and children: not to mention the
theft of their identity)? If there were no higher authority to answer to
other than we ourselves, then and only then, would society be the judge.
The conspiracy continues to worsen...
Continued on page 2